首页 体育内容详情
Usdt第三方支付平台(www.trc20.vip)_Judge delays decision on Latif corruption charges

Usdt第三方支付平台(www.trc20.vip)_Judge delays decision on Latif corruption charges

分类:体育

网址:

SEO查询: 爱站网 站长工具

点击直达

Usdt第三方支付平台

www.trc20.vip)是使用TRC-20协议的Usdt第三方支付平台,Usdt收款平台、Usdt自动充提平台。免费提供入金通道、Usdt钱包支付接口、Usdt自动充值接口、Usdt寄售回收。菜宝Usdt钱包一键生成Usdt钱包、一键调用API接口、一键出售Usdt。

,

THE Sessions Court in Johor Baru today postponed decision on the case against former Johor executive councillor Abd Latif Bandi, his son, and a real estate consultant, who are facing 37 charges of corruption and money laundering over RM35.7 million.

Judge Kamarudin Kamsun, who was scheduled to deliver the verdict today, said there were still some arguments that needed to be submitted by parties involved and he would then rule on August 7.

“I need to listen to those arguments before making a decision. So, I can’t do it today, hence, a new date will be set,” he said.

Lawyer Salehuddin Saidin, represented Latif, 56, and his son, Ahmad Fauzan Hatim, 30, then applied for the court to hear the submission by the defence.

During the proceedings, the court heard submissions by the prosecution, represented by Deputy Director I, legal and prosecution division of the Malaysian Anti -Corruption Commission (MACC) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, and assisted by deputy public prosecutors Ahmad Akram Gharib and Mahadi Abdul Jumaat.

On June 14, 2017, Latif, Ahmad Fauzan and Amir Shariffuddin Abd Raub, 49, were charged with 33 counts of corruption and four counts of money laundering for a total of RM35.7 million, and they pleaded not guilty to all charges.

On April 21, 2019, Kamarudin acquitted and discharged the three of them of the 37 charges after finding the prosecution having failed to prove its case.

However, on November 7, 2021, the High Court ordered the former chairman of the state housing and local government committee and his co-defendants to enter their defence, after it overturned the Sessions Court verdict.

On the corruption charges, the three men are charged under section 28 (1) (C) of the MACC Act 2009, read together with section 16 (a) (B) of the same act.

They were also charged under section 32 (8) (c) and section 89 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti -Terrorism Financing and Proceeds from Unlawful Activities (AMLA) Act 2001. – Bernama, June 26, 2022.


转载说明:本文转载自Sunbet。
  • USDT充值接口(www.caibao.it) @回复Ta

    2022-06-30 00:15:41 

    北京时间7月7日,总决赛首战打响。整场竞赛,艾顿10中8,罚球6中6,拿到了22分19篮板,而且0失误。加油,我们很喜欢

    • 菜宝钱包(www.trc20.vip) @回复Ta

      2022-07-02 00:16:15 

      “高净值对专业投资者来说是历史业绩好的显示,然则在许多缺乏履历的通俗投资者看来,高净值就是贵,他们更喜欢买廉价的基金,好比一元基。以是基金公司经常会通过份额拆分来降低基金净值,吸引投资者介入。”有基金公司市场部人士注释道。谁最喜欢这部?

发布评论